Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:17
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
'Real Housewives' Exec Dies During Childbirth and Stars Are Showing Support - AOL.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Mission Control: Eye of the Storm - NASA (.gov)
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Week in Review: Perplexity Labs wants to do your work - TechCrunch
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump: The war between Israel and Iran should end - Axios
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Have you ever forcibly sucked someone’s dick?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the boldest and craziest thing your mother has ever done for you?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Miley Cyrus Reveals What Caused Her Estrangement from Dad Billy Ray for the First Time - instyle.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
One Risk Of White Wine You’ve Never Heard Of, Research Reveals - MindBodyGreen